Showing posts with label Movie. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Movie. Show all posts

Monday, September 21, 2015

Where Have All the Good Films Gone?




With the Oscar race heating up, a question has begun to linger in my mind, posing itself as a much more bothersome thought than I originally anticipated. Where have all the truly good films gone? 

Yes, I'm sure this question would adhere to backlash all over the place, as many declare their favorite recent films as the best of the best, but are they really? Are you truly looking at the film as a whole, or merely sections of it that satisfy your entertainment craving?

 These are the questions that are ringing through my mind, as year after year I'm starting to see films that are labeled, "good" "magnificent" and "Oscar bait" as just simply films with amazing actors yet no substance in the film itself, superb writing yet subpar directing, or genius directing/acting but no solid writing to speak of.

This is the problem facing many modern day flicks, as each vie for attention- whether it be good or bad- and truly miss the mark and the opportunity to make the film a good one that doesn't rely on flashy gimmicks, one actor, or any other source by itself to make a name for it.

To me, the film needs substance, and I'm not talking about a good performance alone. I'm talking about films that share equal parts outstanding acting, insightful writing, and directing that creates a world so realistic you forget you are at the movies. While I understand that latter statement may be a bit counterproductive since we go to the movies for an escape and not for a realistic world, but to me you should want that escape to be as realistic as possible and not just some cheap thrill that leaves you frustrated and moderately used as you feel the empty hole in your pocket where your money once was. 

What has led me to write this essay are recent "Oscar" contenders that have gained speed simply for the acting alone, which by no means is a bad thing, with little to no mention of the director or writer or vice versa.  

A huge example of this to me is the film, "Black Mass" featuring Johnny Depp in a truly reformative role. While his role in this film is truly a back to form piece for Depp, who has squandered his talents on some stinkers these past few years, the film as a whole falls flat. The writing is unremarkable, especially compared to the film "The Departed" which based one of its main characters off of Bulger as well and did a similar story but did it much better, and the editing/directing wasn't what I thought a film of this caliber should possess. Now I'm not here to bash "Black Mass", in fact it is still an excellent film full f some truly noteworthy scenes, but its the laziness in other categories that this film shows that many other recent films are falling onto as well. 

As more and more films come out, usually the viewer will mention the performances in the film first as the primary thing that stuck out in their heads. While yes, this is a good thing and more films should have actors in it that truly shine and show their passion for the craft, I feel as if films are simply starting to fall on that strand of thought and ignoring the other aspects that make a film one of the greats.

To me a film cannot be one of the greats without the essentials, and the essentials are everything that goes into that film…not just one thing that stands out. While “Black Mass” had some of the best performances to date in it, the lack of character development, choppy editing skills, and directing that didn’t really stand out to me really left me feeling hollow and almost bad if this is something that others are calling the film to beat so far for the Oscars. While I know my opinion may not be a popular one, I also know I’m not alone.

Recently I read an interesting article on Variety.com about the films that appeared at a major film festival, one that usually predicts the nominations for the Oscars later on. While the writer and judges agreed that the films had some truly memorable performances, many felt that almost all the films lacked something. Rather it be directing, editing, writing, make-up, etc., almost all agreed that something was missing and this is a scary thought.

Has the age of the cinema really fallen away from us? Are we as a whole trying to cling and depend more on modern day thrills, cheap and flashy gimmicks of advertising, and films that only need to entertain some part of us for the majority to consider them something great?

I don’t exactly think there is a yes or a no to this question. Films with true substance and excellence come out all the time, and have yet to be released to this day, but it’s a scary thought that the way the Oscar race is starting off seems to be based all on the performances, or just one aspect of the film, and missing the true heart of the Oscar season. That this is an award show based on all aspects of film, not merely just one, and films shouldn’t strive for one thing that is great but should choose to stand out and go above and beyond not only for the filmmaker but for the audience that is looking for that cinema itch to be scratched.

And the audience that is looking for that entertainment fix, don't just focus in on the small things that make a film good and call it a masterpiece for essentially just one thing in the film, focus on all of it! Demand the films you watch possess all the qualities you should desire in a film of great and limitless potential. Look for a change in the films we have become accustomed to, and search for the films that truly show what it means to be considered one of the greats.  

I have extremely high hopes for some films coming out that have been labeled Oscar bait, like “The Danish Girl” and “Steve Jobs”, but I am approaching all of this with some wariness after hearing the same about “Black Mass” and getting a film that showcases the performances in it but misses the point entirely to actually tell a truly brutal and terrifying tale of one of the FBI’s most wanted men.

To me, I refuse to believe the age of cinema is dead…I would rather say it may be in a bit of a transitional period. So here’s to the Oscars, here's to the modern day audiences craving a film with a little more substance, and here's to finding the good films that aren’t lost forever but merely hiding or have yet to be discovered.  
 

Friday, October 18, 2013

Five Frightful Films

Halloween, the time to dress as your favorite ghoul or ghost, the time where the word “diet” does not exist, and the time for horror movies. Some may enjoy a good slasher flick; others enjoy the pop up scares, but whatever you are into everyone knows watching a horror movie on Halloween is a must. I’m here to give a run down of some of my favorites, with a variety of genres in the horror community to choose from for your own personal enjoyment.
1.      For the slasher lover: A Nightmare on Elm StreetOne, Two, Freddy is coming for you…and then the nightmares start. The iconic Freddy Krueger, played by the marvelous Robert Englund, is a must for slasher freaks. The movie plays on the idea that if you die in your dreams, you die in real life. That idea alone is one of the scariest plots in horror movie history. Plenty of gore and mayhem in the movie, and if you love the slasher genre, you will love this.
 2.      For the dark comedy horror lover: The Cabin in the Woods
A very new movie on this list, yet to be is a classic. Joss Whedon is the master at original concepts and ideas for anything fiction. This movie has a perfect amount of comedy, gore, and scares to last a decade, but is perfect for the average movie night. The idea is original and funny, and will surely surprise you to the very end.
 3.      For the pop up scare lover: The Conjuring
Not yet on DVD, but I’m sure you can find in somewhere in the meantime. This movie is also very new, but will scare you to the very core. The visuals and directing style of the film leave you with an eerie sense of dread the whole time. The scares are constant and surprising; not meant for the new horror movie lovers.
Special Mention: Paranormal Activity and Insidious: Both movies are good for a nice fright night.
 4.      For the cheesy horror movie lovers: The original Fright Night
This movie isn’t so much cheesy, as it is slapstick hilarious. The jokes in the movie make it more on the funny side then on the scary one, yet are enjoyable for a variety of viewers. The acting is well done, the jokes are made with perfect timing, and the makeup for it make it very impressive for its time.
Honorable Mention: Tucker and Dale vs. Evil: A newbie, yet great for a good night full of laughs that never cease.
 5.      For the classic horror movie lover: Poltergeist, The Exorcist, The Evil Dead (the original), and Dead of Night
All amazing movies, I could not simply choose. Each is a game changer for all of the genres listed above. Poltergeist is a good pop up scare movie, and The Exorcist could also fall in the pop up scare category as well. The Evil Dead is a combination of dark comedy, Cheesy horror movie, and the slasher genre. It also contains pop ups. The Dead of Night is a trendsetter, with a combination of all of the categories listed above, and set the field for numerous horror movies to come. All of these movies are bloodcurdling and great for Halloween night!
 So if you are in the mood for some ghoulish fun, sit back and enjoy the terrifying… I mean terrific show.  

Thursday, May 2, 2013

Jack Harper, Jack Reacher, Staccee Jaxx, or just plain Jack....

Tom Cruise in Oblivion

Back in the 80's, Tom Cruise was America's action sweetheart. Playing the hero in all of his movies seemed to be his calling, and boy did he live up to that calling. From being in a range of action movies back in the day, each of his movies were full of an excitement that only "The Cruise" could supply...but now and days it seems a little stale. Each of his characters resembles the last in an almost identical way, leaving most, especially me, unsatisfied. In this movie it is no different from his others, even playing ANOTHER character named Jack. This movie, to me, felt like another action movie where Cruise plays the "troubled" hero looking for answers about himself. I've seen Cruise play such great characters, (ie: look at Born the Fourth of July and Magnolia), but this movie left me with an empty feeling, a feeling of when will this movie be over. The movie felt way too long and the writing for it was just not good. The characters developments were not played out in a way where I felt sorry for them or related to them in any way.

Tuesday, April 16, 2013

Roger Ebert: In Memoriam (A short article dedicated to my idol)


Roger Ebert
June 18, 1942-April 14, 2013
Roger Ebert

            Mr. Ebert was not only an extremely talented critic, but he was also my idol. His wise words, humorous take on movies, well thought out critiques, and dedication to the art of reviewing movies inspired me. After reading my first review by him, the review for the recent horror comedy smash Cabin in the Woods, I knew I wanted to do the same thing. From that review and on I was hooked. I found myself looking at his old reviews and continuing to follow up on his recent ones. One thing never changed and that was his humor. It was a special, sarcastic brand that only a few got, and when you got that humor there was no turning back. Each review was more thought out then the other and you could tell that the man behind these articles was someone who cared, someone who wanted you to know the truth behind the movies, and someone who truly was just a simple movie man at heart. From his first review to the last, his pride and love for the art shined throughout each article. Even when ill, Ebert was diagnosed with papillary thyroid cancer, salivary cancer, and other forms of cancer which resulted in his loss of speech, he never failed in sharing his reviews with the world. Ebert’s success became widely known after his show, “At the Movies with Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert” came out and after Siskel’s death he began to host his own show, “Roger Ebert and the Movies”. In 2000, however, Ebert finally found another host for his show in Richard Roeper. The show was titled “At the Movies with Ebert and Roeper” and was a huge success. During all of this he lost his speech during surgery and never recovered it, but still kept his voice through his reviews and his loving wife, Chaz Ebert, who translated his thoughts during presentations. One day before Ebert’s death, he took to his blog to tell everyone he was diagnosed again with a form of cancer and would be dialing back the amount of reviews he did for the sake of his health. He told of his dreams to actually just review the movies he wanted to review, but said that he would still be present in reviews. In the article on his blog, the “Leave of Presence” sounded more like a farewell to good friends. The article brings tears to my eyes, knowing these were some of the last words written by my hero, but I do not fret. I know where ever he may be now; he is still watching the movies he loves and looking down on us with a smile on his face for all the up and coming critics who looked to him for inspiration. In my career I hope to become half as successful as him and to tell people twenty years from now when they ask who got me started on my path to becoming a critic, I can say Ebert, Roger Ebert. Now just like his last words, I leave you all with just a taste of Ebert. I look up from the laptop I am writing this from, with a smile planted on my face and I say to you Mr. Ebert, “I’ll see you at the movies.”           

Sunday, April 7, 2013

Good, Bad ....She's the girl with the chainsaw

(Warning some slight Spoilers)
When I first heard that they were remaking "The Evil Dead" I was disheartened. Why would they touch a masterpiece such as the original "Evil Dead". When Ash himself came out and said it wasn't so much a remake more like its own movie, I felt a bit better. So I got ready, put on my big girl pants and went to see the movie....and boy am I glad I did. Now before I go on with my review, I will say the movie isn't perfect. Far from it....some parts are a bit dull and predictable and the gore is a bit excessive, but what it lacks in that department it makes up for in the well acted performances of a bunch of unknowns and the scary outlook that surrounds the movie. It mixes a perfect amount of terror and funny that it made me smile with memories of the old movies. It does not have a blatant show of funny like the other movies, but it is funny in its own way. Some parts did make me jump, in particular the performance of Jane Levy as Mia, the female "Ash" of the story. She portrayed a terrifying demon for most of the movie and a  terrified young recovering drug addict for the other half. She was believable in both parts and I'm excited to see where her character goes in the sequel (which was announced shortly before the premiere of the movie.) The other performance I particularly enjoyed was that of the young actor Lou Taylor Pucci as Eric, one of Mia's close friends. He seemed to be the voice of reason and knew almost immediately what was going on. If we are being critical, he appears to be the reason of all of this and he knows it. He tries to get everyone on board with what is happening and at first they all ignore his ideas, but when blood starts to hit the fan they begin to realize his pleas and Mia's were right all along. He gives a funny, yet startling scary performance. You feel bad for the guy and you know his voice of reason shtick is either just going to get him killed or it may save him, you never know see the movie! But either way I enjoyed his character, and he became my fast favorite. The movie is a completely different entity from the other "Evil Dead's" but it does have a couple of winks to the other movies. For example, they show the famous necklace that was featured in the first two "Evil Dead's", they show Ash's old car, they show the possessed "hand" from "Evil Dead 2", and of course the power tools are not far behind every character, especially the famous chainsaw. Now with all of my enjoyment for the movie one thing seemed to bother me....Where was the female Ash we were promised? I loved Jane Levy in the movie, but in the beginning I didn't see the Ash in her I was expecting. But I was wrong. Towards the end, she became a fighter and therefore the Ash I was waiting for. With chainsaw in hand she was no longer the damsel in distress and was cursing off demons and killing them at a college level. She was a bad-ass and I was happy to see it. If you are interested in seeing this movie, I say think no longer and go. It's worth it and I promise you will enjoy it. Keeping reminding yourself though, if you are a fan of the original "Evil Dead's"...this is not those movies, it is different and should be accepted as such. Go to see a new movie, not a remake and I promise you will enjoy it.
~Pop Culture Darling